How to Tell if an Article Is Peer-Reviewed

When selecting journal articles for a course, distinguishing between genuinely peer-reviewed publications and non-peer-reviewed works is critical. Peer-reviewed articles undergo rigorous scrutiny by subject matter experts to ensure academic rigor and adherence to systematic quality standards. Only articles meeting these standards can be submitted as Peer-Reviewed Publications in Woolf courses, while non-peer-reviewed articles may still be submitted as "Publications" if deemed relevant and of high quality by the college.

This article outlines how to verify the peer-reviewed status of an article and identifies warning signs of potentially predatory journals.


Identifying Peer-Reviewed Articles

Verify peer-review claims by checking:

  • Journal's Website: Look for explicit mentions of the peer-review process in the journal's About section or submission guidelines.
  • Article Details: Peer-review status may be mentioned on the first page of the article or in accompanying metadata.
  • Publisher’s Policy: Check the publisher’s website for overarching policies indicating peer-reviewed content across their journals.

If no claim of peer review can be found, assume that the article is not peer-reviewed.


Assessing the Credibility of Peer-Review Claims

Even if a journal claims to be peer-reviewed, you should corroborate this claim with the following checks:

1. Reputable Publisher

  • Publishers like Routledge, Wiley, or Science Direct are highly unlikely to misrepresent the peer-reviewed nature of their work.

2. Academic Editorial Board

  • Ensure the editorial board consists of scholars affiliated with accredited institutions.
  • Cross-check the editorial members’ profiles on their institutional websites to confirm their credentials.

3. Indexing in Academic Databases

  • Credible databases like IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, or PubMed reliably list peer-reviewed articles.
  • Avoid using non-curated databases like Google Scholar for this purpose.

Warning Signs of Predatory Journals

1. Profit-Driven Business Model

  • Predatory journals prioritize high author fees over academic rigor. Legitimate journals emphasize their peer-review process, plagiarism checks, and correction policies.

2. Non-Academic Editorial Board

  • A journal without academically affiliated editors is a red flag.

3. Fake ISSN

  • Check whether the International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) provided by the journal is valid using the ISSNPortal.

Note: If you encounter a work that does not meet peer-review standards but is academically relevant, consider submitting it as a "Publication" instead of PRL and choosing another work to meet PRL requirements.

Related Links